[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Sun, 25 Jul 2021 17:30:07 -0400
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 11:36 AM Titus von der Malsburg
> Sure, that’s always possible. However, my suspicion is that users in the
> majority of cases want /just/ the local bibliography when they specify one.
> If true, a better default would be to only return the local bibliography.
> Personally, I can’t think of a use case where you would like to use a mix of
> multiple bibliographies, local and global, especially where there is no way
> to see from which bibliography each entry is coming. What about duplicates,
> for instance, i.e. entries that exist in multiple bibliographies?
Maybe this should be flipped, so we can still have the flexibility to
combine both, but default is local has precedence?
So in other words, one has to explicitly turn on the global
Re: org-cite-list-bibliography-files, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/07/28
Re: org-cite-list-bibliography-files, Titus von der Malsburg, 2021/07/28
Re: org-cite-list-bibliography-files, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/07/30