[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer
From: |
Rainer M Krug |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:29:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin) |
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
> On 25.9.2013, at 08:48, Rainer M Krug <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Rainer, hi Carsten,
>>>
>>> it does not get lost - it is in my queue. As are, unfortunately,
>>> another 35 threads with possible bugs. Help is definitely wanted.
>>
>> That's what I was looking for - confirmation that is in somebodys
>> processing queue. Thanks Carsten.
>>
>> Unfortunately I can't hel as I have barely the elisp knowledge to
>> maintain my .emacs file.
>>
>>>
>>> Please see below for my comments and a possible fix.
>>>
>>> On 23.9.2013, at 09:40, Rainer M Krug <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just resend this bug report which has been confirmed by Ista Zahn.
>>>>
>>>> Updated via git ust now:
>>>>
>>>> Org-mode version 8.2 (release_8.2-14-ge5f16b @
>>>> /Users/rainerkrug/.emacs.d/org-mode/lisp/)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When starting to edit a code block via C-c ' everything works as expected
>>>> and the code block is highlighted and an indirect buffer is opened.
>>>>
>>>> When I click into the highlighted block, I an "send" to the indirect
>>>> buffer. This behavior changes, after saving with C-s, even when nothing
>>>> has been edited: the area in the original org file looses its magic, and
>>>> looks normal again and can also be edited!
>>>>
>>>> The indirect buffer stays functional and, upon close via C-c ' saves the
>>>> changes into the original buffer and *overwrites* changes done in this
>>>> block in the org document.
>>>
>>> This is a bug which is difficult to fix in all generality. What
>>> should really happen is that the text in the original buffer is made
>>> read-only.
>>
>> Yup - exactly. That would be the best solution.
>>
>>> But so far this does not happen in our implementation (due
>>> to Dan Davison IIRC). The reason for this is that read-only text
>>> properties left by accident in a buffer are difficult to get rid of.
>>>
>>> There are many things the user could go back and screw up the
>>> original. That's why Org choses to protect with highlighting with an
>>> overlay. Note that this is not a protection against editing, but it
>>> is a visual warning.
>>
>> Possibly because I am using the mouse most of the time to navigate in
>> text and select buffers, I did not realize this.
>>
>>>
>>> However, what happens during saving is indeed a problem - the overlay
>>> gets lost (not really, it gets squeezed to zero by first removing the
>>> source code and then inserting the modified version).
>>>
>>> Could you please try this patch and test it to see if it is stable and
>>> does the right thing?
>>
>> Tried briefly and it seems to work:
>>
>> 1) the visual overlay stays there upon C-x s from indirect buffer
>>
>> 2) If I click with the mouse into it, I am redirected to the indirect
>> buffer (correct terminology here?)
>>
>> Let me know when you pushed it to git, than I can upgrade again.
>
> I pushed this fix to maint and master.
Thanks,
Rainer
>
> - Carsten
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Rainer
>>
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> - Carsten
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lisp/org-src.el b/lisp/org-src.el
>>> index 0f88174..062d2d7 100644
>>> --- a/lisp/org-src.el
>>> +++ b/lisp/org-src.el
>>> @@ -757,6 +757,8 @@ with \",*\", \",#+\", \",,*\" and \",,#+\"."
>>> (delete-region beg (max beg end))
>>> (unless (string-match "\\`[ \t]*\\'" code)
>>> (insert code))
>>> + ;; Make sure the overlay stays in place
>>> + (when (eq context 'save) (move-overlay ovl beg (point)))
>>> (goto-char beg)
>>> (if single (just-one-space))))
>>> (if (memq t (mapcar (lambda (overlay)
>>>
>>>
>> <#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign>
>>
>> --
>> Rainer M. Krug
>>
>> email: RMKrug<at>gmail<dot>com
>>
>>
>
<#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign>
--
Rainer M. Krug
email: RMKrug<at>gmail<dot>com
- Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer, (continued)
- Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer, Sebastien Vauban, 2013/09/24
- Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer, Rainer M Krug, 2013/09/25
- Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer, Carsten Dominik, 2013/09/25
- Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer, Rainer M Krug, 2013/09/25
- Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer, Eric Schulte, 2013/09/25
- Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer, Rainer M Krug, 2013/09/25
- Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer, Andreas Leha, 2013/09/25
- Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer, Rainer M Krug, 2013/09/26
- Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer, Rainer M Krug, 2013/09/25
- Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer, Carsten Dominik, 2013/09/25
- Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer,
Rainer M Krug <=