[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated fil
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem) |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Feb 2023 11:25:21 +0800 |
Please remove the redundant braces after ``if (noninteractive)''. Thanks.
On February 24, 2023 10:20:39 AM GMT+08:00, Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On 2/23/2023 4:50 PM, Jim Porter wrote:
>> Since the last message I posted, I'm now also seeing this test fail, though
>> I get a segfault instead. I bisected this to commit
>> a555abc56d5270cebe94f904189526d7ac433a94 ("Fix order of faces in
>> 'face-list'").
>>
>> I'm pretty surprised by this, since that patch is *very* simple, but I can
>> reliably segfault with it, and never segfault without it. I'll keep digging
>> to see what's going on here.
>
>The segfault is in FACE_FROM_ID_OR_NULL, called from
>Finternal_merge_in_global_face. It happens because the face_cache is null
>during these tests (since Emacs is noninteractive).
>
>The attached patch fixes the issue for me, though I'm not totally sure it's
>the *right* fix. Any thoughts? (I'm also not 100% sure this is the same issue
>you're seeing...)
- server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Jim Porter, 2023/02/13
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Paul Eggert, 2023/02/13
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Jim Porter, 2023/02/15
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Paul Eggert, 2023/02/15
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Paul Eggert, 2023/02/23
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Jim Porter, 2023/02/23
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Jim Porter, 2023/02/23
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem),
Po Lu <=
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Jim Porter, 2023/02/23
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/24
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Jim Porter, 2023/02/24
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/24
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Alan Mackenzie, 2023/02/24
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Jim Porter, 2023/02/24
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/24
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Paul Eggert, 2023/02/26
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/26
- Re: server.el test failures (was: Re: bug#9800: Incomplete truncated file buffers from the /proc filesystem), Jim Porter, 2023/02/27