[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode
From: |
Theodor Thornhill |
Subject: |
Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Feb 2023 19:43:57 +0100 |
Ergus <spacibba@aol.com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 07:10:28PM +0100, Theodor Thornhill wrote:
>>
>>
>>On 17 February 2023 19:02:28 CET, Ergus <spacibba@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>Yep! Is there any particular style? Would pragmas be indented from the parent
>>scope, and the next line after it be at the same level as the pragma?
>>
>>Theo
>>
>
> Hi:
>
> Yes, pragmas will be generally indented from the parent scope,
> continuation lines are usually in the same level or one level more,
>
> And then everything continues as usual:
>
> These are the common use cases I know so far:
>
> // outline pragmas
> #pragma bla
> int myfunction1()
> {...}
>
> int main()
> {
> // inline pragmas for functions
> #pragma bla bla
> somefunction1()
>
> // inline pragmas for function with continuation one level more
> #pragma bla bla\
> the continuation of pragma
> somefunction2()
>
> // inline pragma for a block of code
> #pragma bla2
> {
> this is a block as usual
>
> // nested pragma
> #pragma mynestedpragma
> bla()
> }
> }
>
> Best and thanks,
> Ergus
Great, thanks! I think I have a good idea about what you want, and I'll
see if I can come up with something.
Theo
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, (continued)
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/02/16
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, Ergus, 2023/02/17
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/17
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/02/17
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/17
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, Ergus, 2023/02/17
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/02/17
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, Ergus, 2023/02/17
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/02/17
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, Ergus, 2023/02/17
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode,
Theodor Thornhill <=
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, Felix, 2023/02/15
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/16
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/02/16
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, Felix, 2023/02/16
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/15
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/02/15
- Re: Missing features in c-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/16