[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacsql-sqlite-builtin
From: |
Richard Kim |
Subject: |
Re: emacsql-sqlite-builtin |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Feb 2023 19:45:53 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
"Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie> writes:
> Gregor Kling [2023-02-01 13:21 +0100] wrote:
>
>> On 01.02.23 12:10, Basil L. Contovounesios wrote:
>>
>>> What versions do you have installed?
>>
>> Status: Installed in ‘emacsql-3.1.1/’ (unsigned).
>
> This looks like the version from MELPA Stable.
>
>> Status: Installed in ‘emacsql-sqlite-builtin-20221127.2146/’ (unsigned).
>
> And this like the version from MELPA.
>
> This seems like a likely culprit, because the emacsql-connection class
> changed between these versions.
>
> What is your value of package-archives?
>
> I suggest making sure all your EmacSQL packages are installed from the
> same archive:
>
> either https://elpa.nongnu.org/nongnu-devel/
> or https://melpa.org/packages/
>
> This should ensure that their versions are mutually consistent.
>
> If different versions of the same package exist in different archives,
> you can tell Emacs precisely where to get different packages from by
> customising the user options package-archive-priorities and
> package-pinned-packages.
>
> HTH,
You need to pick up Jan 18 fix in emacsql, i.e.,
https://github.com/magit/emacsql/commit/2e6056df110e76da4eabb413f8781c4f1edddf20
which fixed the "deleted buffer" problem initially reported against
emacs as https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=60872
Alternately you can build emacs using a version prior to cfd2b3504ab
which was checked in on Jan 12. If you do, then you can stay with older
emacsql.