[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages
From: |
Matt Armstrong |
Subject: |
Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Nov 2022 10:22:44 -0800 |
Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 08 2022, Richard Stallman wrote:
>
>> Making it even worse, once BAR:HACK is recorded as the meaning of HACK
>> in FOO's symbol table (obarray), there was no way to make it mean some
>> other symbol HACK.
>
> That's technically wrong: it is possibly to "shadow" inherited symbols.
Yes, Common Lisp apparently grew mitigations for the pitfalls of
:use/use-package after Richard had experience with them. I do not think
the pitfalls went away, though.
- Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages, (continued)
- Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages, Richard Stallman, 2022/11/08
- Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages, Yuri Khan, 2022/11/09
- Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages, tomas, 2022/11/09
- Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages, Matt Armstrong, 2022/11/09
- Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages, Juanma Barranquero, 2022/11/09
- Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/11/09
- Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages, Helmut Eller, 2022/11/09
- Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages,
Matt Armstrong <=
- Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages, Richard Stallman, 2022/11/08
- Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages, Matt Armstrong, 2022/11/09
Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages, Richard Stallman, 2022/11/02
Re: Help sought understanding shorthands wrt modules/packages, Richard Stallman, 2022/11/02