Re: The new keymap functions

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 13.11.2021 15:07, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Joost Kremers<joostkremers@fastmail.fm>  writes:
>
> > If they do something different from what `local-unset-key` and
> > `global-unset-key` do, would it perhaps be useful to name them differently as
> > well? Perhaps `unbind` instead of `unset`?
> Or -remove, perhaps?

And for symmetry with 'remove', we could use 'put' instead of 'set'.

It would sound more like working with a hashmap/hashtable (which a 
keymap is, in a sense).