[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitte
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jul 2021 19:10:52 +0300 |
> Cc: stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, manuel@ledu-giraud.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:24:35 +0300
>
> On 28.07.2021 16:27, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > The whole point of using TS is NOT to require that
> > the Emacs development team or Emacs users should know enough about
> > parsing of the many languages Emacs supports to modify the grammar.
> > We want another, independent development team to take care of that,
>
> I think we know both, though? There are a number of niche languages that
> only Emacs supports.
>
> Or at least that aren't likely to get good support in TreeSitter.
Either someone motivated will write a TS grammar for them, or they
will continue be supported by "other means".
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, (continued)
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/27
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Manuel Giraud, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Daniele Nicolodi, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Perry E. Metzger, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/29
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Yuan Fu, 2021/07/29
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/29
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Arthur Miller, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Óscar Fuentes, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Arthur Miller, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Ergus, 2021/07/30