[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitte

From: Daniele Nicolodi
Subject: Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:51:15 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0

On 28/07/2021 16:24, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> On 28.07.2021 16:27, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> The whole point of using TS is NOT to require that
>> the Emacs development team or Emacs users should know enough about
>> parsing of the many languages Emacs supports to modify the grammar.
>> We want another, independent development team to take care of that,
> I think we know both, though? There are a number of niche languages that 
> only Emacs supports.
> Or at least that aren't likely to get good support in TreeSitter.

I don't see how adding support for TreeSitter can cause any problem to
those. Would you like to elaborate? No one is proposing to disable other
mechanism for fontification and syntax analysis in Emacs.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]