[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs CLA requirement
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs CLA requirement |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jun 2021 18:44:56 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I haven't been following any GCC or glibc discussions, though.
> If they have reliably determined that the FSF can in fact
> legally defend arbitrary GNU project code by itself, without
> the involvement of any other copyright holders, then perhaps
> the situation is different.
I have not tried to read all their discussions (it would be too much).
However, from what I have heard, I don't think they have tried to
address such questions.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Re: Emacs CLA requirement,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Emacs CLA requirement, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/06/16
- Re: Emacs CLA requirement, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/06/16
- Re: Emacs CLA requirement, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/06/16
- Re: Emacs CLA requirement, tomas, 2021/06/16
- Re: Emacs CLA requirement, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/06/16
- [OFFTOPIC] Apple and GPL (was: Emacs CLA requirement), Stefan Monnier, 2021/06/16
- [OFFTOPIC] Apple and GPL (was: Emacs CLA requirement), Christopher Dimech, 2021/06/16
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Apple and GPL (was: Emacs CLA requirement), Eli Zaretskii, 2021/06/16
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Apple and GPL (was: Emacs CLA requirement), tomas, 2021/06/16
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Apple and GPL (was: Emacs CLA requirement), Alexandre Garreau, 2021/06/16