[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs CLA requirement
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs CLA requirement |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:37:38 +0000 |
Andrei Kuznetsov <r12451428287@163.com> writes:
> Furthermore, a contributor license agreement allows the FSF to migrate
> Emacs' grant of license at any time -- whilst the regular "or later"
> clause only allows Emacs to also be available under a later version of
> the GPL; If a malicious actor relying on hypothetical system X, which is
> resolved in a hypothetical GPLv4 in the future, decides to redistribute
> a future Emacs under system X, then he would be able to do so after
> removing the small portion of contributions made under the "GPLv4 or
> later" clause. That seems like a rather big problem.
What do you mean by "system X"? Could you give a more concrete example?
--
Philip K.
Re: Emacs CLA requirement, Richard Stallman, 2021/06/18
Re: Emacs CLA requirement,
Philip Kaludercic <=
- Re: Emacs CLA requirement, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/06/16
- Re: Emacs CLA requirement, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/06/16
- Re: Emacs CLA requirement, tomas, 2021/06/16
- Re: Emacs CLA requirement, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/06/16
- [OFFTOPIC] Apple and GPL (was: Emacs CLA requirement), Stefan Monnier, 2021/06/16
- [OFFTOPIC] Apple and GPL (was: Emacs CLA requirement), Christopher Dimech, 2021/06/16
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Apple and GPL (was: Emacs CLA requirement), Eli Zaretskii, 2021/06/16
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Apple and GPL (was: Emacs CLA requirement), tomas, 2021/06/16
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Apple and GPL (was: Emacs CLA requirement), Alexandre Garreau, 2021/06/16
Re: Emacs CLA requirement, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/06/16