[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lsp and Haskell
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: lsp and Haskell |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2020 12:47:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
On November 10, 2020 11:36:47 AM GMT+02:00, Mario Lang <mlang@blind.guru> wrote:
>
> As I understand it, we currently require copyright assignment for
> every
> extra package we make available by default. Putting rules in place is
> likely a good idea, but is this one rule really helping Emacs?
> It feels a bit harsh. I totally understand that we require
> assignments
> for everything that goes into core Emacs. But third party packages?
> Really?
> If I am not misunderstanding this, what is the actual rationale behind it?
This issue has been discussed here many times, last time in May this year.
Rather than start yet another thread on the same issue, where people will again
reiterate the same views and opinions, could you perhaps read those past
discussions, where you will find answers to the copyright assignment questions?
Thanks.