[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A modern-mode?
From: |
Arthur Miller |
Subject: |
Re: A modern-mode? |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:32:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
<tomas@tuxteam.de> writes:
> Those modes are often opinionated (they have to). So it's better
> if the mode's opinions align with those of the user.
What I have learned by following emacs-dev mail list is that any,
feature here is opinionated.
> It'll be Emacs's job to provide the bridges and the common base
> for all of that (someone in this monster thread quoted X11's
> motto of providing "mechanism, not policy": I think this is
> - mutatis mutandis - a good guiding principle).
Indeed, "mechanism not policy" is one of the the best feature of X11
(along with being a network protocol too).
- Re: A modern-mode?, (continued)
- Re: A modern-mode?, João Távora, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, João Távora, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Thibaut Verron, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, João Távora, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, tomas, 2020/09/16
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alan Third, 2020/09/17
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/17
- Re: A modern-mode?,
Arthur Miller <=
RE: A modern-mode?, Drew Adams, 2020/09/16