[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ? |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Mar 2020 23:08:41 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> How about some form of "include" mechanism:
> Local Variables:
> @include: FILENAME
> End:
> I would suggest implementing that with the same care, considerations,
> and restrictions as has `eval' for Locals
Specifying another file has a serious problem: you can't be sure which file
will get included.
Better to refer to something above in the file.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, (continued)
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Robert Pluim, 2020/03/23
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/23
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Robert Pluim, 2020/03/23
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/03/23
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Dima Kogan, 2020/03/23
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/03/23
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Richard Stallman, 2020/03/23
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Richard Stallman, 2020/03/11
- Re: Can we expand the valid location of "Local Variables" ?, Yuri Khan, 2020/03/23