Re: Some ideas with Emacs

[Emanuel Berg]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> We could add more examples where the
> description is not self-explanatory
> enough [...]

And when the common use case is somehow
different or unexpected, from reading
the description.

And when there is a really exotic use-case
that no one would ever think of from just
reading the description.

Ever read grammar book for natural (human)
languages? First there are a bunch of rules.
One is like "...?" Then comes examples. And one
is like "aah"!

Finding _the right_ examples is the challenge.
Examples that illustrate the rule(s) and also
tells something interesting in their own right.

-- 
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
https://dataswamp.org/~incal