[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The netsec thread
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: The netsec thread |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:14:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Robert Pluim <address@hidden> writes:
> I had some issues with nsm-trust-local-network as a concept and also
> the IP addresses it checked. And 0.0.0.0/8 is now a valid range (on
> very recent Linux kernels anyway), so that test needs adjusting.
Oh, yeah, I had forgotten about that bit. Yes, I wasn't convinced about
that bit, either.
> Did I send a patch for that? I donʼt remember, and Monday morning
> laziness is strong today.
Let's see... You didn't push it to the netsec branch, at least. If you
manage to find the patch, please do.
> Sure. Please leave network-security-level 'paranoid alone, though.
That's another bit I'd forgotten about; thanks. Yes, we want to leave
that as is.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: The netsec thread, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/07/28
- Re: The netsec thread, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/07/28
- Re: The netsec thread, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/07/28
- Re: The netsec thread, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/07/28
- Re: The netsec thread, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/07/28
- Re: The netsec thread, Robert Pluim, 2019/07/29
- Re: The netsec thread, Robert Pluim, 2019/07/29
- Re: The netsec thread, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/07/29
- Re: The netsec thread,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: The netsec thread, Robert Pluim, 2019/07/29
- Re: The netsec thread, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/07/30
- Re: The netsec thread, Robert Pluim, 2019/07/30
- Re: The netsec thread, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/07/30
- Re: The netsec thread, Robert Pluim, 2019/07/30