Re: 7 logical-xor implementations in source tree

[Basil L. Contovounesios]

0001-Add-conditional-operators-xor-and-equiv-to-subr.el.patch
Description: Text Data

"Basil L. Contovounesios" <address@hidden> writes:

> Oleh Krehel <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Should we figure out where to put the "main" `xor' and declare the rest as
>> obsolete aliases?
>
> Yes please!  I've had a patch to this effect sitting on a local branch
> for a while now.  Will touch it up and send soon.

Now attached.

It defines xor using defsubst instead of define-inline, so that it can
be included in subr.el.  Would defun be preferred instead?

It also includes Mattias' equiv suggestion.

WDYT?

Thanks,

-- 
Basil