Re: Filling the docstring generated by define-minor-mode

[Stefan Monnier]

>> Filling is probably a better solution in that it's more general (of
>> course, that presumes there's no embedded code examples which could be
>> mis-filled, but in this particular case it seems like a non-issue).
> That's why I think is a good fit for this particular case,

Agreed.

> but not for filling docstrings as a rule.

[ Actually, I think we should aim for automatic refilling in the
  longer run.  That means using a format that unambiguously distinguishes
  prose from preformatted contents.  But that's another discussion.  ]


        Stefan