[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Split `simple.el'?
From: |
Clément Pit-Claudel |
Subject: |
Re: Split `simple.el'? |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Apr 2018 16:00:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 |
On 2018-04-05 02:33, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Clément Pit-Claudel <address@hidden>
>> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 22:37:25 -0400
>>
>> That buffer is very strange. Selecting parts of it causes the fonts to
>> change in all sorts of surprising ways.
>
> Anything like that is generally a bug: it means we don't supply enough
> of the buffer to the shaping engine for it to return the correct
> glyphs, which means some problem in the composition rules and/or in
> the shaping engine itself (which in your case is libotf/libm17n-flt).
Thanks. Then I'll report the issue if I can reproduce it reliably.
- Re: Split `simple.el'?, (continued)
- Re: Split `simple.el'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/04/08
- Re: Split `simple.el'?, Juri Linkov, 2018/04/08
- Re: Split `simple.el'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/04/08
- Re: Split `simple.el'?, Juri Linkov, 2018/04/09
- Re: Split `simple.el'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/04/09
Re: Split `simple.el'?, John Wiegley, 2018/04/04
Re: Split `simple.el'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/04/05
Re: Split `simple.el'?, John Wiegley, 2018/04/05
Re: Split `simple.el'?, Jefferson Carpenter, 2018/04/04
RE: Split `simple.el'?, Drew Adams, 2018/04/04
Re: Split `simple.el'?, Achim Gratz, 2018/04/05