Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [Emacs-diffs] scratch/widen-less a4ba846: Replace prog-widen with consolidating widen calls

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 12/20/17 9:13 PM, John Wiegley wrote:
> > > > > > "DG" == Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > > I've pushed it to widen-less (without scratch/ now). Comments welcome!
>
> DG> The current state looks good to me. Okay to merge?
>
> It looks fine to me.

Thanks! Merging.

> Maybe indent--funcall-widened should be a macro or
> defsubst?

I'd rather avoid premature optimization (and there's a couple of way we 
could choose to rewrite indent-for-tab-command that this function is not 
needed), but I wouldn't argue if someone else did this.

FWIW, I'm told define-inline is a better choice these days.