|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [Emacs-diffs] scratch/widen-less a4ba846: Replace prog-widen with consolidating widen calls |
Date: | Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:54:01 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:58.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/58.0 |
On 12/14/17 4:32 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
[ I don't think in those terms: with the new convention, an indent-line-function still can call widen as much as it wants, it just doesn't need to and probably doesn't want to. ]
How should we word it, then? "shouldn't" is not a far cry from "should avoid narrowing" which I used in the indentation section. Any better way to say that, as well?
No, indeed, it doesn't talk about the different uses of narrowing. It probably should say something, tho, especially w.r.t this new convention.
Suggestions welcome, if any. If you want to see it in Emacs 26, at least.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |