|
From: | Philipp Stephani |
Subject: | Re: prin1 / princ vs message ? |
Date: | Sun, 02 Jul 2017 14:27:24 +0000 |
Conclusion of that exchange (sorry for being a little slow to understand everything the 3 of you wrote):This:(prin1 name)
(princ " is ")
(princ (if (memq (aref status 0) '(?a ?e ?i ?o ?u)) "an " "a "))
(princ status)
(princ " package.\n\n")Can reasonably be replaced by this:(let (sentence (format "The status of package %1$S is `%2$s'.\n\n" name status)))
(princ sentence))Is that correct ?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |