|
From: | Tino Calancha |
Subject: | Re: prin1 / princ vs message ? |
Date: | Sun, 2 Jul 2017 23:23:52 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: | Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) |
On Sun, 2 Jul 2017, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote:
Conclusion of that exchange (sorry for being a little slow to understand everything the 3 of you wrote): This: (prin1 name) (princ " is ") (princ (if (memq (aref status 0) '(?a ?e ?i ?o ?u)) "an " "a ")) (princ status) (princ " package.\n\n") Can reasonably be replaced by this: (let (sentence (format "The status of package %1$S is `%2$s'.\n\n" name status))) (princ sentence)) Is that correct ? (I am using the numbered fields that Philipp Stephani implemented in June.)
Yeah, it looks right.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |