[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: When should ralloc.c be used?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: When should ralloc.c be used? |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:08:32 +0200 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 07:33:12 -0400
>
> > > It would be a lot of work for me to try that myself, and I think it is
> > > not necessary if you already tried it. What fractional speedup did
> > > you observe when you tried it?
>
> > About 20, as I wrote.
>
> Sorry, I am not sure what 20 means here.
> Was it a speedup of 20%?
> A factor of 20?
A factor of 20.
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, (continued)
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/29
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/29
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/29
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/30
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, Alp Aker, 2016/10/30
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/30
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used? (WAS: bug#24358), Richard Stallman, 2016/10/24
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used? (WAS: bug#24358), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/25
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used? (WAS: bug#24358), Richard Stallman, 2016/10/26
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used? (WAS: bug#24358), Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/25
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used? (WAS: bug#24358), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/25
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used? (WAS: bug#24358), Richard Stallman, 2016/10/26
- Re: When should ralloc.c be used?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/10/24