[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Tookits (was Re: Emacs as browser)
From: |
Perry E. Metzger |
Subject: |
Tookits (was Re: Emacs as browser) |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:39:26 -0400 |
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:53:15 +0300 Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> The only advantage of Qt is that it's multi-platform, but GTK is
> also multi-platform.
Well, to be precise, it seems to be "mostly" multiplatform. By this I
mean that it appears that it is possible for features that use the API
to build on the X side but not on other systems. For example,
apparently the GTK based xwidgets stuff doesn't build on OS X, or at
least doesn't currently.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger address@hidden
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), (continued)
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Philippe Vaucher, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Philippe Vaucher, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Richard Stallman, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Philippe Vaucher, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/21
- Tookits (was Re: Emacs as browser),
Perry E. Metzger <=
- Re: Tookits (was Re: Emacs as browser), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/21
- Re: Tookits (was Re: Emacs as browser), Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/21
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Richard Stallman, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Paul Eggert, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Richard Stallman, 2016/10/20
- Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again), Perry E. Metzger, 2016/10/20
- Re: Concurrency, again, Philipp Stephani, 2016/10/25
- Re: Concurrency, again, joakim, 2016/10/12
- Re: Concurrency, again, John Wiegley, 2016/10/12