[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Oct 2016 20:09:55 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "Søren" == Søren Pilgård <address@hidden> writes:
Søren> Be aware that Emacs lisp is not Common lisp and such a mapping does
Søren> have some pitfalls, especially around dynamic scoping and buffer local
Søren> variables.
Søren> I remember some blogposts about this (from 2012)
Søren> http://tromey.com/blog/?p=709 http://tromey.com/blog/?p=751
Søren> http://tromey.com/blog/?p=778
I still love this wacky idea, but I pretty much moved on to:
https://github.com/tromey/el-compilador
The basic idea here being to eventually write Emacs in Emacs Lisp.
I no longer think the language needs a radical change. It can just
evolve in place.
Tom
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, raman, 2016/10/10
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Kelvin White, 2016/10/07
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Søren Pilgård, 2016/10/07
Re: Emacs Lisp's future, John Wiegley, 2016/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Toon Claes, 2016/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, John Wiegley, 2016/10/09
- Re: Concurrency, again (was: Emacs Lisp's future), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/10
- Re: Concurrency, again, Paul Eggert, 2016/10/10
- Re: Concurrency, again, Stefan Monnier, 2016/10/12
- Re: Concurrency, again, raman, 2016/10/12
- Re: Concurrency, again, John Wiegley, 2016/10/12