[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: IDE |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:28:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Przemysław Wojnowski <address@hidden> writes:
> W dniu 17.10.2015 o 10:39, David Kastrup pisze:
> [...]
>> My refactoring work tends to be done using stuff like
>>[...]
> With all due respect, please spend a morning with a modern IDE (like
> Intellij, Eclipse) to learn how they make programmers productive.
Not really interested. This refactoring was necessitated by stuff being
implemented with a contorted C macro system. Any refactoring system
able to do this out of the box would be too complicated to learn.
> Especially look at their refactoring features. It's a different
> league.
To sed? Uh, that's not a particularly interesting contest since sed has
no refactoring features at all. Multi-line replacements are noisome
enough. At any rate, I am not interested in using other tools here.
Scripting means I can work incrementally and put the respective
responsible script into the commit message.
Which means that redoing that particular refactoring when branches are
rebased or my commit takes a week for reviewing while other changes pour
in is then trivial.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: IDE, (continued)
- Re: IDE, Evgeniy Dushistov, 2015/10/23
- Re: IDE, David Engster, 2015/10/23
- Re: IDE, Evgeniy Dushistov, 2015/10/23
- Re: IDE, David Engster, 2015/10/23
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/17
- Re: IDE, Steinar Bang, 2015/10/18
- Re: IDE, John Wiegley, 2015/10/18
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/18
- Re: IDE, John Wiegley, 2015/10/18
- Re: IDE, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/25
- Re: IDE, Eric Ludlam, 2015/10/13
- Re: IDE, David Kastrup, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/10
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/10