[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: string> missing?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: string> missing? |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Jun 2015 22:04:41 +0300 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:56:14 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> > You say that this goal no longer exists, but the practice of Emacs
> > maintenance tells me otherwise. We are still making optimization
> > changes, some of them quite deep and pervasive ones, for very little
> > benefits, like a few percents decrease in memory footprint or in CPU
> > usage, even under the most favorable conditions.
>
> Adding string> might be 200 bytes. Saving 200 bytes is insignificant.
It was also insignificant back when you decided not to include it.
- Gnus & Mail-Followup-To (was: string> missing?), (continued)
- Gnus & Mail-Followup-To (was: string> missing?), Nicolas Richard, 2015/06/04
- Re: Gnus & Mail-Followup-To, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/04
- Re: Gnus & Mail-Followup-To, Nicolas Richard, 2015/06/04
- Re: Gnus & Mail-Followup-To, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/05
- Re: Gnus & Mail-Followup-To, Nicolas Richard, 2015/06/06
- Re: string> missing?, Thierry Volpiatto, 2015/06/04
- Re: string> missing?, Nicolas Petton, 2015/06/04
- Re: string> missing?, Richard Stallman, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/04
- Re: string> missing?, Richard Stallman, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: string> missing?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?, Ivan Shmakov, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/06
- Re: string> missing?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/06
- Re: string> missing?, Richard Stallman, 2015/06/06
- Re: string> missing?, Richard Stallman, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/06
- Re: string> missing?, Richard Stallman, 2015/06/06