[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: string> missing?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: string> missing? |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Jun 2015 17:24:44 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
I decided to define string< and not string> back when keeping Emacs
small was a major design goal. Even one additional function was worth
avoiding. I considered > so basic that it was worth adding, but
string> we could live without.
That goal no longer exists. I see no harm in adding string> for
symmetry, now.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: string> missing?, (continued)
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/04
- Re: string> missing?, Bozhidar Batsov, 2015/06/04
- Gnus & Mail-Followup-To (was: string> missing?), Nicolas Richard, 2015/06/04
- Re: Gnus & Mail-Followup-To, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/04
- Re: Gnus & Mail-Followup-To, Nicolas Richard, 2015/06/04
- Re: Gnus & Mail-Followup-To, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/05
- Re: Gnus & Mail-Followup-To, Nicolas Richard, 2015/06/06
- Re: string> missing?, Thierry Volpiatto, 2015/06/04
- Re: string> missing?, Nicolas Petton, 2015/06/04
- Re: string> missing?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/04
- Re: string> missing?, Richard Stallman, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?, Ivan Shmakov, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/05
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/06
- Re: string> missing?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/06
- Re: string> missing?, Richard Stallman, 2015/06/06