[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: string> missing?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: string> missing? |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:13:58 +0300 |
> From: Nick Andryshak <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 12:50:47 -0400
>
> What good reasons are there specifically to keep the '>' function? What
> does '(> A B)' do that '(< B A)' doesn't?
If you want to argue for removal of one of them, feel free.
But that doesn't reflect in any way on the issue at hand. Once again,
there's no requirement to be "consistent" in this sense.
- Re: string> missing?, (continued)
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nicolas Petton, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Andreas Schwab, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Jay Belanger, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Jay Belanger, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Thibaut Verron, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Thibaut Verron, 2015/06/04
- Re: string> missing?, Nicolas Richard, 2015/06/04