[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: string> missing?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: string> missing? |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Jun 2015 18:55:53 +0300 |
> From: Nick Andryshak <address@hidden>
> Cc: Nicolas Petton <address@hidden>, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 11:46:44 -0400
>
> > What would '(string> A B)' do that '(string< B A)' doesn't?
>
> Functionally, nothing, but it seems silly to have only one without the
> other, don't you think?
No, I don't.
> Why would a language have '<' without '>'?
Because it's enough?
> > With that argument, we'd also need string<= and string>=.
>
> Nothing wrong with that.
That's just the tip of the iceberg. We have quite a few of other
similar situations in Emacs Lisp.
- string> missing?, Nicolas Petton, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nicolas Petton, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Andreas Schwab, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Nick Andryshak, 2015/06/03
- Re: string> missing?, Jay Belanger, 2015/06/03