[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:41:28 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
martin rudalics <address@hidden> writes:
>> Emacs should never automatically delete the last frame on a terminal;
>> that is obnoxious. So other-visible-frames-p needs to be changed to
>> handle this. (Not sure why that function is in C, btw; it could be
>> written in Lisp.)
>
> Without doing FRAME_SAMPLE_VISIBILITY? I have no idea how to do that so
> I'd be grateful if someone wrote such a function. I'm somewhat lost
> with daemons and terminals.
I've fixed this directly in window-deletable-p.
>> Secondly, the current code is too aggressive in deciding that a frame
>> can be deleted. Consider the following sequence:
>>
>> C-h k RET
>> C-x o => switch to the *Help* window
>> C-x 5 2 => pop to a new frame displaying *Help*
>> q => the frame is deleted
>>
>> I don't think this is quite right. The new frame was not created as a
>> "temporary frame" for displaying the *Help* window, but by the user's
>> explicit `C-x 5 2' command. It just so happened that a special-mode
>> buffer was current at the time. In this situation, quit-window should
>> not delete the frame.
>
> Then I'll revert to the previous behavior which kills the frame even if it
> has some buffer it could show instead.
Note sure what you mean. Wouldn't that make the frame deletion even
more aggressive?
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, (continued)
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/09/12
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/09/12
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, martin rudalics, 2011/09/12
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/09/12
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, martin rudalics, 2011/09/13
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Chong Yidong, 2011/09/12
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, martin rudalics, 2011/09/13
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/09/13
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, martin rudalics, 2011/09/13
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/09/13
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour,
Chong Yidong <=
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, martin rudalics, 2011/09/13
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Chong Yidong, 2011/09/13
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/09/12
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, martin rudalics, 2011/09/12
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Andy Moreton, 2011/09/12
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/09/12
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/12
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, martin rudalics, 2011/09/13
- Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/13
Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour, Rasmus, 2011/09/10