|
From: | martin rudalics |
Subject: | Re: Uhm... weird frame behaviour |
Date: | Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:59:28 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
>> This would break `delete-frame' which apparently _should_ delete a frame >> even if it's the last one in that case. > > ??? That special frame cannot possibly be deleted anyway, because it > is never displayed. Are you sure? Even if there's another visible frame? > Are we talking about the same thing? By "that case" I meant the last visible frame. `other-visible-frames-p` calls other_visible_frames which is the routine `delete-frame' uses to decide whether a frame can be deleted with FORCE nil. So the criterion I use is the same criterion used by `delete-frame'. martin
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |