[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding |
Date: |
Fri, 13 May 2011 09:06:01 -0700 |
> > I just hit `Reply All', as usual. Looking at past replies of mine,
> > I see that some of the mails I replied to were addressed to
> > address@hidden, and others were addressed to
> > <bugnb>@debbugs.gnu.org - and this within the same thread! Why?
>
> Probably the ones with "address@hidden" are the ones
> you did not receive from gnu.org but instead you received directly
> via a Cc/Bcc/Fcc to yourself.
Yes, OK. But what does it mean in terms of what someone should do when
replying? `Reply All' works for all of these, even though
<bugnb>@debbugs.gnu.org is not a recipient. And it did not work when all I
changed was "RE" to "OT".
- bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13