[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding |
Date: |
Fri, 13 May 2011 11:58:12 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> The bug tracker created a new bug:
> bug#8670: OT: bug#8667: 24.0.50;`bounds-of-thing-at-point' returns (N . N) for
> `comment'
> I thought it would keep the same bug # since the # was in the Subject.
The main and reliable way the tracker uses is the email address you use.
If you send it to <bugnb>@debbugs.gnu.org, then it won't pay attention
to the subject and will not generate a new bug-number for it.
OTOH if you send an email to address@hidden or
address@hidden, this is usually presumed to be a new bug report,
and the subject is checked for some common patterns to catch
common mistakes.
Stefan
- bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding,
Stefan Monnier <=
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stefan Monnier, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2011/05/13
- RE: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Drew Adams, 2011/05/13
- Re: bug tracker woes/misunderstanding, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/05/13