[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk.
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk. |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Feb 2011 05:49:15 +0200 |
> From: Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 12:29:34 -0600
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> Is it OK to bring the change back with gnus-overrides.texi and
> -DWEBHACKDEVEL? Or are there objections still?
I still think it's wrong to have a versioned file that needs to be
modified for some optional build. It would be better to have the
Makefile create that file (as empty) as part of the build, if it
doesn't already exist. Then it doesn't need to e in the repository,
and developers who need to invoke WEBHACKDEVEL will simply create it
before running Make.
- Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/05
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2011/02/05
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/05
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2011/02/05
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Ted Zlatanov, 2011/02/07
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk.,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Peter Münster, 2011/02/08
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/08
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Andreas Schwab, 2011/02/08
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Peter Münster, 2011/02/08
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/08
- -DWEBHACKDEVEL for Gnus (was: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk.), Ted Zlatanov, 2011/02/08
- Re: -DWEBHACKDEVEL for Gnus, Peter Münster, 2011/02/08
- Re: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk., Andreas Schwab, 2011/02/05
- Gnus overrides.texi and WEBHACKDEVEL (was: Revision 103117 on the Emacs trunk.), Ted Zlatanov, 2011/02/05
- Re: Gnus overrides.texi and WEBHACKDEVEL, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/05