|
From: | Richard Stallman |
Subject: | Re: Guile in Emacs |
Date: | Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:33:33 -0400 |
I do not understand the point about documentation though. Why would it be harder to document a common lisp based emacs than a scheme based emacs? Common Lisp has sooo much to document. The Emacs Lisp Manual would get a lot bigger if it had to include the specs of so many functions.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |