[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile in Emacs
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Guile in Emacs |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:02:30 -0400 |
Common Lisp is extremely complicated and ugly. When I wrote GNU Emacs
I had just finished implementing Common Lisp, and I did not like it
much. It would bloat Emacs terribly, and documenting it would be hard
too.
Scheme is elegant, and it is a better direction to move in.
Since we have our own Scheme implementation, we should use that one.
If it has a serious disadvantage, we should do something about that.
There are various things that might be right to do, but simply
disregarding it in the case of Emacs cannot be right.
- Re: Guile in Emacs, (continued)
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Bruce Stephens, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, joakim, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Christian Lynbech, 2010/04/13
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Thomas Lord, 2010/04/13
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Christian Lynbech, 2010/04/13
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Thomas Lord, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Bruce Stephens, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2010/04/14
- RE: Guile in Emacs, Drew Adams, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David Kastrup, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David Kastrup, 2010/04/15