[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: redisplay system of emacs
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: redisplay system of emacs |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:08:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) |
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
> > most-positive-fixnum => 536870911
>
> Oops. I wish you had posted 30 minutes earlier, I just misquoted
> myself in another channel. Thank you (and Eli) for the correction,
> anyway.
This value has been in flux, anyway. I suppose it might at one point of
time reach the 1GB value of XEmacs (which is pretty much the maximum
power of 2 possible for tagged words).
> > > log files, there's nothing like (X)Emacs!
>
> > less is better, actually. I need my virtual memory for other things
> > than decorated log files.
>
> I don't decorate the log files. I use things like M-x occur or M-x
> delete-non-matching lines on them, though. Does less support such
> features now?
Well, you can search for non-matches by starting the regexp with !. And
you can limit the display to matching/non-matching lines using &. And
you can search across multiple files with specific search pattern
characters as well.
It's not really all too bad.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: redisplay system of emacs, (continued)
- Re: redisplay system of emacs, Ken Hori, 2010/01/28
- redisplay system of emacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/28
- Re: redisplay system of emacs, grischka, 2010/01/29
- Re: redisplay system of emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/30
- Re: redisplay system of emacs, Alan Mackenzie, 2010/01/30
- Re: redisplay system of emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/30
Re: redisplay system of emacs, Richard Stallman, 2010/01/30