[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: merge conlict?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: merge conlict? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:49:46 -0500 |
Distinguishing between trunk->branch merges that are useful and those
that merely create unreadable history (as displayed by bzr) requires
fine judgment.
Should only the maintainers, Stefan and Yidong, be able to do
trunk->branch merges?
- Re: merge conlict?, (continued)
- Re: merge conlict?, Thierry Volpiatto, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Richard Stallman, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Richard Stallman, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Karl Fogel, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Richard Stallman, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
Re: merge conlict?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/25