[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: merge conlict?
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: merge conlict? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:06:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) |
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
> Richard Stallman writes:
> > If my guess is right, Mark merged trunk into his private branch, and
> > then pushed to upstream, which is very wrong.
> >
> > If we think this is wrong practice, can we customize something so that
> > it isn't allowed?
>
> No. Merging [snip]
The problem is `merge && push', not `merge && commit'. Stefan already
asked about this on the bzr ml and it seems that there is a method for
disabling just that.
- Re: merge conlict?, (continued)
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Richard Stallman, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: merge conlict?, Richard Stallman, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Richard Stallman, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Karl Fogel, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Richard Stallman, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/26