[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers".
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers". |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Jan 2010 08:39:51 -0500 |
> Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:44:59 +0100
> From: Jan Djärv <address@hidden>
>
> % bzr merge
> bzr: ERROR: Working tree "/home/jhd/src/bzr/emacs/fixes/" has uncommitted
> changes (See bzr status).
>
> If I do bzr status, almost the whole tree is listed as modified (except files
> added and removed and not version controlled).
>
> I certainly didn't modify all files, in fact I modified none. I just tried
> to
> sync from savannah before starting to modify files. Is this expected from
> bzr?
No. Something is definitely wrong. The workflow described on the
wiki works for me without any changes, including in a feature branch
where there are real non-trivial changes wrt the trunk.
Perhaps you somehow did something wrong while creating the branch.
If you start another branch, does "bzr status" show that all files are
modified, right after branching? If not, when does it start showing
modified files?
> Should I create a new branch each time I sync from savannah
Certainly not.
- Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers"., Jan Djärv, 2010/01/03
- Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers".,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers"., Bojan Nikolic, 2010/01/03
- Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers"., Richard Stallman, 2010/01/03
- Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers"., Bojan Nikolic, 2010/01/03
- Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers"., Richard Stallman, 2010/01/04
- Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers"., Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/04