[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation
From: |
dhruva |
Subject: |
Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:39:22 +0530 |
Hi,
On 8/21/07, Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> wrote:
> Otherwise, it should be possible to keep both the old and the new code
> (e.g. by making two sys_select_new and sys_select_old functions, and
> choose the right one at run-time.)
I am planning to just use function pointers (pfn_XXXX). I am sure it
an be handled easily. For now, I will just focus on getting the new
ASYNC implementation working on newer msw and consider porting at a
later point.
Shall I first hack the sys_select and getting rid of threads for sub
processes in the first go?
I will need help in understanding the handling of keyboard and mouse
events (not even sure if sys_select handles them or it is somewhere
else). I can handle all the typical file and IPC related IO but have
no clue regarding UI events.
-dky
--
Dhruva Krishnamurthy
Contents reflect my personal views only!
- QUERY: w32 sub process implementation, dhruva, 2007/08/19
- Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation, Jason Rumney, 2007/08/19
- Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation, dhruva, 2007/08/19
- Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/20
- Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation, Jason Rumney, 2007/08/21
- Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation, Davis Herring, 2007/08/21
- Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/21
Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation, Kim F. Storm, 2007/08/19