[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:42:02 +0300 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 03:46:51 -0400
>
> Lots of people in poor countries run versions of Windows prior to XP.
> XP has activation features that cause trouble for them.
>
> Whether this means they run Windows 98 or Windows ME, I don't know.
> I don't remember all the versions of Windows; was there one in between
> ME and XP?
There was Windows 2000, but I don't think many users in poor countries
use it. I think Windows 9x/ME is the most widespread OS there.
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, (continued)
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/04/01
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Davis Herring, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/04
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/03