[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:00:47 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:35:30 -0400
>
> > Anything to do with coding-systems in C code is difficult. Especially when
> > almost every encoding on Windows involves autoloaded CCL based
> > coding-systems.
>
> It doesn't have to be done in C. Since decoding may run elisp code, it has
> to be done somewhere where lisp can be run, so you may as well do it by
> calling an elisp routine from C.
In the middle of keyboard-reading code, this is a highly complicated
way of committing suicide. Especially since the w32 keyboard
processing is split between two threads, unlike on other platforms.
> Of course, you have to figure out where to
> do it, and make sure that it's indeed a place where lisp can be run.
Exactly.
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/01
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/01
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/01
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/04/01
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Davis Herring, 2007/04/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/03