[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:42:33 -0400 |
Should not pending-undo-list be permanent buffer local?
As far as I can see, it cannot ever make a difference. That variable
is only used within a sequence of consecutive undo commands, and they
don't change the major mode.
- pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/30
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/31
Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?,
Richard Stallman <=