[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:11:57 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
"Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <address@hidden> writes:
> Are you sure this true even if kill-all-local-variables are called from
> post-command-hook or from a timer? If so can you please explain to me why?
It doesn't matter anyway, since pending-undo-list isn't buffer-local in
the first place.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/30
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/31
Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31