[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: PURESIZE increased (again) |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Apr 2006 19:49:38 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:27:42 -0400
>
> > -(defvar backup-inhibited nil (#$ . 2763))
> > +(defvar backup-inhibited nil (#$ . 2801))
>
> The number is the position in the file (in bytes) of the
> corresponding docstring. It's presumably different because the source file
> name in comment earlier in the file.
Thanks. That was my guess, but I wanted to be sure.
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), (continued)
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Reiner Steib, 2006/04/27
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Reiner Steib, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Andreas Schwab, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Reiner Steib, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/29
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/29
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Andreas Schwab, 2006/04/29
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/21
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/22
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Miles Bader, 2006/04/22
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/22
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/22
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/22
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Nick Roberts, 2006/04/22
- RE: PURESIZE increased (again), Drew Adams, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/23