Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?

[Herbert Euler]

> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> To: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden,  address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Subject: Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?
> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 01:43:25 +0200
>
> And of course, consistency would do no harm.  I have not sampled other
> limits, whether system-imposed or user-modifiable, so I can't vouch
> whether one or the other name seems more in line with other usage.

Maybe it's stupid: Is it possible to let the Lisp debugger register some
variable so that once the Lisp interpreter see debugger has finished
and 'max-specpdl-size' is different from what user set it will set 'max-
specpdl-size' back, to keep the consistency of other applications of
the term 'max'?  (I think 'max' in other applications, at least in most
other applications, is inherent.)

Regards,
Guanpeng Xu

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/