From: Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
CC: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
Subject: Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:44:19 -0500 (CDT)
Miles Bader wrote:
"Herbert Euler" <address@hidden> writes:
>> But if so I think the name 'max-specpdl-size' should be altered,
since
>> normally a maximum value needs explicitly change, i.e. there
should be
>> a particular function to change a maximum value.
>>
>>What would you think of specpdl-size-limit as a name for this?
>
> Yes it's better, since this name (in my opinion) is not confused.
They sound exactly the same to me...
They sound exactly the same to me too. I do not see any reason to
change the current name.